Thursday, December 31, 2015
Sunday, December 27, 2015
Insurance News - Sunday, December 27, 2015
Here are the leading auto insurance headlines from ONTARIO AUTO INSURANCE TOPICS ON TWITTER for Sunday, December 27, 2015:
- Studies suggest that insurance customers will walk away if purchasing insurance is slow, complicated and difficult.
- The $75,000 problem for self-driving cars is going away as the cost of LIDAR sensors drop.
- Self-driving cars can lure drivers into false sense of security and even lull them to sleep.
- If you want to know why Uber ignores regulators and not intimidated by law suits? Because they are worth around $85 billion.
- Uber is testing out food delivery in Toronto.
- Uber is also trying out commuter service to compete with the TTC.
- In Uber fight, taxi drivers on wrong side of history – and consumerism.
Wednesday, December 9, 2015
Government Posts Proposed Changes to DRS Regulations
The Ministry of Finance has posted proposed changes to Insurance Act regulations to provide for the transition the Automobile Insurance Dispute Resolution System from the Financial Services Commission of Ontario (FSCO) to the Ministry of the Attorney General's Licence Appeal Tribunal (LAT), and the wind down of disputes filed at FSCO.
Proposed amendments include:
• The last date for submitting applications for mediation, neutral evaluation, or the appointment of an arbitrator to FSCO will be March 31, 2016.
• An application for an appeal to the FSCO Director of Arbitrations will only be accepted where the application for the appointment of an arbitrator was received by March 31, 2016.
• As well, an applications for a variation or revocation to the FSCO Director of Arbitrations will only be accepted where the application for the appointment of an arbitrator was received by March 31, 2016.
• The Office of the Director of Arbitrations will continue to function until all notices of appeal and all applications for variation or revocation have been finally determined.
• Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule (SABS) provisions that apply to the dispute resolution process at FSCO will continue to apply, as they read on March 31, 2016, to all applications that were received by FSCO before the transition date but are not finally determined before that date. The SABS will also be amended, where necessary, to apply to applications filed at the LAT on or after April 1, 2016.
Proposed amendments include:
• The last date for submitting applications for mediation, neutral evaluation, or the appointment of an arbitrator to FSCO will be March 31, 2016.
• An application for an appeal to the FSCO Director of Arbitrations will only be accepted where the application for the appointment of an arbitrator was received by March 31, 2016.
• As well, an applications for a variation or revocation to the FSCO Director of Arbitrations will only be accepted where the application for the appointment of an arbitrator was received by March 31, 2016.
• The Office of the Director of Arbitrations will continue to function until all notices of appeal and all applications for variation or revocation have been finally determined.
• Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule (SABS) provisions that apply to the dispute resolution process at FSCO will continue to apply, as they read on March 31, 2016, to all applications that were received by FSCO before the transition date but are not finally determined before that date. The SABS will also be amended, where necessary, to apply to applications filed at the LAT on or after April 1, 2016.
Tuesday, December 8, 2015
Competition Bureau Supports Ride-Sharing Services
The emergence of Uber and other ride-sharing services has created increased competition for the Canadian taxi industry. This has created a source of friction for the industry because of what they see is an "uneven playing field." Taxi operators are required to follow regulatory rules while ride-sharing services largely operate unregulated. The Canadian Competition Bureau recently weighed in on the subject.
The Competition Bureau recently released a study, Modernizing Regulation in The Canadian Taxi Industry, which concluded that the competition in the sector has benefited consumers. However, there needs to be a balance between increased competition and the need for regulation.
The taxi industry has operated largely unchanged for decades. Regulators have created rules to govern price, vehicle safety and insurance requirements. But the regulatory rules often restrict entry into the sector by limiting the number of taxi licences. The number of plates usually does not keep up with demand for services which creates artificial scarcity, but also higher prices, poor service and long wait times.
Ride-sharing companies have changed the landscape by offering consumers lower prices, variable pricing (higher fares when demand is high), shorter wait times, and convenience. The software application used by ride-sharing companies provides automatic payment and the ability to track the number of vehicles available in the local area. The software also allows consumers to rate drivers which creates an incentive to provide better service. Low rated drivers receive fewer ride requests.
The innovations introduced by Uber and other similar service providers have benefited consumers. There is a need for updated regulatory rules so that traditional taxi operators can respond to the competition. But the one aspect not addressed by the Competition Bureau study is the insurance issue.
In September 2015, Intact Financial announced plans to work with Uber to create products tailored for the ride-hailing service, after concerns emerged that person auto insurance policies may not cover drivers using their personal vehicles for commercial gain. In the meantime, Uber claims it has adequateinsurance coverage and that every ride on the UberX platform is backed by $5 million of commercial auto insurance, which covers both bodily injuries and property damage stemming from a crash. However, Alberta government said in July that it had determined the policies do not meet the requirements of the province’s Insurance Act. It's all very confusing.
Ride-sharing services are here to stay. Consumers will benefit but only if the regulatory rules and updated and the insurance issues are addressed.
Wednesday, December 2, 2015
Insurance News - Wednesday, December 2, 2015
Here are the leading auto insurance headlines from ONTARIO AUTO INSURANCE TOPICS ON TWITTER for Wednesday, December 2, 2015:
- There is a substantive risk associated with relying on insurer examination reports to deny serious claims which can be compounded by taking a matter to arbitration without having sufficient evidence to support a position.
- Why auto insurance rates are so high in the Greater Toronto Area.
- There is a down side to low gas prices - more vehicle traffic and more accidents.
- LAT releases update on transfer of auto insurance disputes from FSCO. LAT still planning on accepting disputes beginning April 1st.
- Consumers big winners in new law regulating towing operators.
- Ontario’s auto insurance overhaul needs to put consumers first according to a former New Jersey regulator.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)